Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game 1 Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 90% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 90% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 90% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 10% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| Game Handicap: CNV (-1.5) vs Dorado Gaming (+1.5) | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
Market context
Conviction are scheduled to play Dorado Gaming in a North American Challengers League group-stage best-of-three, and the market is currently pricing a near-certain Conviction win, with the crowd at 100% YES on the Polymarket-style binary market. That looks aggressive relative to bookmaker-style pricing elsewhere: one esports odds page has Conviction around 1.177 decimal, which translates to a little over 85% implied probability before any margin, while another lists roughly 1.30 for Conviction and 3.23 for Dorado, implying a much wider but still Conviction-favoured line.[3][8]
The historical frame also points towards Conviction, not perfection. These teams have met at least twice in recent NACL play, and Conviction won both series, including a 2-0 sweep in their most recent clash on 14 May 2026.[2][5][7] That matters because BO3 markets tend to compress upset risk less than single-map markets, yet a 100% crowd price leaves no room for draft volatility, patch adaptation, or an early-game mistake that could flip a map and force a longer series; by comparison, trader-facing platforms often show the same edge as an implied probability rather than a full-price yes/no quote, which makes the gap easier to see than on decimal-odds books.[3][7][13]
For catalysts, the main watchpoints are simple: whether the match is actually started on schedule, whether roster or schedule changes are announced by NACL organisers, and whether any last-minute broadcast or bracket adjustments appear before the settlement window closes.[1][3][14][15] The market rules also make execution risk important: if the series is cancelled, left incomplete without a winner, or delayed beyond seven days, resolution falls to 50-50 rather than either team.[1] KYC and access also diverge by venue: Polymarket-style markets are crypto-native and usually less traditional in onboarding, whereas Kalshi, Betfair and Smarkets are fiat platforms with stronger identity checks and jurisdictional limits, so the same match can trade with different participation pools, fees and liquidity even when the underlying fixture is identical.
Methodology
We read LoL: Conviction vs Dorado Gaming (BO3) - North American Challengers League Group Stage from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Kalshi Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Kalshi Alternative offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade LoL: Conviction vs Dorado Gaming (BO3) - North Ameri… on Kalshi Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →