Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| US Cremonese (-1.5) | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| US Cremonese O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| US Cremonese O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| US Cremonese 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| US Cremonese 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| UC Sampdoria (-1.5) | 0% |
| US Cremonese (-2.5) | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| US Cremonese O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| US Cremonese 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| US Cremonese 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| UC Sampdoria 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
The Coppa Italia fixture between US Cremonese and UC Sampdoria is scheduled for 17 August 2026 at 14:45 ET, with settlement contingent on whether additional betting markets will be offered on this match across major platforms. The 100% implied probability reflects near-certainty that supplementary markets—beyond standard win/draw/loss—will materialise, though the specific markets remain unspecified at publication.
Historical precedent suggests Coppa Italia matches routinely attract expanded market coverage on established sportsbooks. Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair and Smarkets have all offered derivative markets on Italian domestic cup fixtures in prior seasons, though coverage patterns differ markedly. Betfair's exchange model typically enables user-generated markets with lower friction than Kalshi's binary-only structure, whilst Polymarket's AMM pricing can diverge substantially from traditional decimal odds during low-liquidity periods. The 100% reading here suggests traders across platforms perceive minimal execution risk that at least one secondary market will launch by the settlement deadline.
Traders should monitor official Coppa Italia scheduling confirmations and broadcaster announcements, as fixture postponements or cancellations would directly impact market creation incentives. Platform-specific KYC requirements also matter: Kalshi's US-resident restriction versus Polymarket's broader international reach means liquidity distribution may fragment across venues. Fee structures—Kalshi's flat settlement fees versus Betfair's commission-on-winnings model—will influence whether smaller derivative markets justify creation. Any injury announcements or squad roster changes affecting either club could theoretically influence whether platforms deem secondary markets commercially viable, though such factors remain secondary to the binary fixture-occurrence question.
Methodology
This page compares US Cremonese vs. UC Sampdoria - More Markets specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Kalshi Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
- Which platform supports Klarna/SOFORT?
- Directly: none. Polymarket accepts only USDC on Polygon. Kalshi Alternative offers a fiat on-ramp via Klarna or SOFORT (DE/AT/CH) and converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. T+1 processing.
Trade US Cremonese vs. UC Sampdoria - More Markets on Kalshi Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →