Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat | 100% |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 Rounds | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 Rounds | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Rounds | 100% |
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Asplund to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Pat to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% |
Market context
Steven Asplund’s heavyweight fight with Guilherme Pat is priced in the market as a near-certain Asplund win, with the crowd-implied probability at 100% YES even though public sportsbooks still show a more conventional favourite-versus-underdog split. Recent UFC pricing has Asplund around -290 to -305 and Pat around +235 to +253, which translates to roughly a 75%–72% win chance for Asplund before vig, far below the market’s current extreme reading.[2][13][16] That gap matters on platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade as direct probabilities in cents, while Betfair-style exchanges and sportsbook screens usually present decimal or American odds with different fee and margin structures, and access can vary by KYC and jurisdiction.
Comparable markets suggest the current price is much more aggressive than the wider fight market consensus. Several MMA odds aggregators and sportsbook previews place Asplund as the clear favourite but not remotely at a 100% certainty level, with consensus moneyline estimates clustering in the low-to-mid 70s and some independent models still leaving Pat with a meaningful upset chance.[2][4][14] On exchange-style venues, that means a trader is not just backing the favourite but implicitly pricing out the possibility of a Pat win, a draw, or any official non-result, which is a very different proposition from taking Asplund at short odds on a bookmaker screen.[6][9]
The key catalysts are straightforward: the official weigh-in, any late injury or bout-order change, and the UFC’s post-fight result, because the market settles only on an official UFC declaration.[6] The settlement window runs to 2026-08-09T03:59:59.999Z, so a postponement or cancellation beyond 22 August would force the 50-50 outcome under the rules.[6] Traders should also watch for any card reshuffle around UFC Fight Night: Gamrot vs Salkilld, since main-card placement can change if earlier bouts overrun or a fighter misses weight, and those operational details tend to matter more on prediction platforms than on standard sportsbook tickets.[6][10]
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $744K.
Methodology
We read UFC Fight Night: Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat (Heavyweight, Main Card) from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Kalshi Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Steven Asplund vs. Guilherme Pat (H… on Kalshi Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →