🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica

Cross-platform snapshot for "Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Sport Lisboa e Benfica 71% Draw 21% Heart of Midlothian FC 8% Volume: $50K Liquidity: $16K Closes: 13 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
71% 29% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
71% 29% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Sport Lisboa e Benfica71%
Draw21%
Heart of Midlothian FC8%

Market context

Benfica host Hearts in the first leg of a UEFA Europa League qualifying tie, and the market’s **8% YES** implies the Scottish side are a clear outsider. That lines up with sportsbook-style pricing from the same fixture: one listing shows Benfica around **1.20 decimal** for the home win, with Hearts at **17.50** and the draw at **8.85**, which translates to a far higher raw win probability than the exchange-style figure on a yes/no market.[15][18] The difference matters on platform comparison: Polymarket expresses the outcome as an implied probability, while Betfair and Smarkets generally show decimal odds and then apply commission or fees at the account level, so the same view can look tighter or looser depending on how the edge is displayed. KYC reach also differs, with regulated books and exchanges typically requiring fuller verification than a crypto-native prediction market.

Comparable ties usually push traders towards the stronger home side unless there is a major team-news shock. Benfica’s recent European form and home control have been reflected in live coverage, while Hearts’ path has been framed as an underdog assignment, especially away from Tynecastle and against a deeper squad.[8][19] The market is also sensitive to the two-leg structure: if the second leg remains live, a low YES price can still move on aggregate state rather than just raw match strength. Past reporting on the same matchup also showed Benfica’s first-leg dominance in Lisbon, which is the kind of result that typically anchors expectations for the return fixture.[10][14]

The main catalysts are team sheets, injury updates, and whether either side rotates because of league scheduling or a compressed European calendar. Official line-up release and late fitness news are the most direct drivers of repricing, and the venue matters because the fixture is set for Tynecastle Park rather than Lisbon on 13 August according to match listings.[6][12] Traders should also watch for any change to kick-off time or competition context, since some listings and live pages have historically shown the earlier Lisbon leg date and aggregate state, which can confuse fast-moving markets if settlement is tied to the specific August return leg.[1][4][6]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Live Data & Statistics

The Polymarket order book prices Sport Lisboa e Benfica at 71% for "Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica".

Sport Lisboa e Benfica 71% Other 29%

Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $50K.

Methodology

This page compares Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
Which platform is accessible globally?
Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Kalshi Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Are all these platforms regulated?
No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
and

Trade Heart of Midlothian FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica on Kalshi Alternative

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →

Related Topics

Sports