Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
81% | 19% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Go to the live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
81% | 19% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Go to the live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Go to the live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Go to the live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Go to the live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Mojtaba Khamenei | 81% |
| No Head of State | 5% |
| Reza Pahlavi | 3% |
| Alireza Arafi | 3% |
| Hassan Khomeini | 1% |
| Ahmad Vahidi | 1% |
| Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf | 1% |
| Muhammad Mirbaqiri | 0% |
| Sadegh Larijani | 0% |
| Hassan Shariatmadari | 0% |
| Maryam Rajavi | 0% |
| Massoud Rajavi | 0% |
| Seyed Hossein Mousavian | 0% |
| Reza Pirzadeh | 0% |
| Navid Shomali | 0% |
| Mustafa Hijri | 0% |
| Ali Motahari | 0% |
| Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel | 0% |
| Mostafa Pourmohammadi | 0% |
| Sadegh Mahsouli | 0% |
| Masoud Pezeshkian | 0% |
| Saeed Jalili | 0% |
| Hassan Rouhani | 0% |
| Mahmoud Ahmadinejad | 0% |
| Mohammad Khatami | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| Mohammad Pakpour | 0% |
| Ali Larijani | 0% |
| Abbas Araghchi | 0% |
| Mohsen Araki | 0% |
| Nasir Hosseini | 0% |
| Ahmad Hosseini Khorasani | 0% |
| Ali Asghar Hejazi | 0% |
| o | 0% |
| p | 0% |
| q | 0% |
| r | 0% |
| s | 0% |
| t | 0% |
| u | 0% |
| v | 0% |
| w | 0% |
| x | 0% |
| y | 0% |
| z | 0% |
| aa | 0% |
| ab | 0% |
| ac | 0% |
| ad | 0% |
| ae | 0% |
| af | 0% |
| ag | 0% |
| ah | 0% |
| ai | 0% |
| aj | 0% |
| ak | 0% |
| al | 0% |
| am | 0% |
| an | 0% |
| ao | 0% |
| ap | 0% |
| aq | 0% |
| ar | 0% |
| as | 0% |
| at | 0% |
| au | 0% |
| av | 0% |
| aw | 0% |
| ax | 0% |
| ay | 0% |
| az | 0% |
| ba | 0% |
| bb | 0% |
| bc | 0% |
| bd | 0% |
| be | 0% |
| bf | 0% |
| bg | 0% |
| bh | 0% |
| bi | 0% |
| bj | 0% |
| bk | 0% |
| bl | 0% |
| bm | 0% |
| bn | 0% |
| bo | 0% |
| bp | 0% |
| bq | 0% |
| br | 0% |
| bs | 0% |
| bt | 0% |
| bu | 0% |
| bv | 0% |
| bw | 0% |
| bx | 0% |
| by | 0% |
| bz | 0% |
| ca | 0% |
| cb | 0% |
| cc | 0% |
| cd | 0% |
| ce | 0% |
| cf | 0% |
| cg | 0% |
| ch | 0% |
| ci | 0% |
| cj | 0% |
| ck | 0% |
| cl | 0% |
| cm | 0% |
| cn | 0% |
| co | 0% |
| cp | 0% |
| cq | 0% |
| cr | 0% |
| cs | 0% |
| ct | 0% |
| cu | 0% |
| cv | 0% |
| cw | 0% |
| cx | 0% |
| cy | 0% |
| cz | 0% |
Market context
The key real-world question is who is actually exercising Iran’s top state power at the end of 2026, not who has the formal title. That matters here because the market definition points to de facto control over the armed forces, national institutions and executive decision-making, so a clerical figure, an interim council, or a security chief could all qualify depending on how authority settles by year-end. Reuters reported in April that, after Khamenei’s death, IRGC and security leaders were dictating war strategy while Mojtaba Khamenei’s role was more about endorsement than command, which is why a low single-digit price on an alternative outcome can persist even when one name is still nominally on top[2].
The historical frame is a succession crisis rather than a clean constitutional transfer. Reuters said Khamenei’s killing left Iran in its most perilous crisis since 1979, with no clear decision-maker and an unresolved succession race, while the Soufan Center and CFR both emphasised that the system can absorb a transition without immediately collapsing, but that authority becomes far less coherent than under Khamenei[5][11][4]. That is the sort of environment where prediction markets can diverge sharply: Polymarket shows outcome-specific shares, while Kalshi and Betfair-style books usually translate the same question into a single price or decimal odds, making 5% YES on one venue comparable in probability terms but not in payout after fees. Smarkets typically adds lower commission than a spread-style book, but KYC access and jurisdiction still matter for which traders can participate.
Catalysts are likely to be institutional rather than electoral. Traders should watch any leadership announcement from the Assembly of Experts, signals from the interim leadership council, and signs that IRGC commanders or senior clerics are being treated as the real arbiter of state decisions. Reuters also reported in March that U.S. intelligence did not see the government at risk of collapse and believed the IRGC and interim leaders retained control, which suggests that any change in the market will probably come from visible reallocation of command rather than regime breakdown[9]. On platforms that quote decimals, that kind of ambiguity can keep prices sticky; on Polymarket’s implied-probability display, the same uncertainty shows up as a low but non-zero tail on “No Head of State” or other non-standard outcomes.
Methodology
This page compares Iran leader end of 2026? specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
FAQ
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. Kalshi Alternative has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
- Are all these platforms regulated?
- No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
Trade Iran leader end of 2026? on Kalshi Alternative
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →