🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

Counter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs 1WIN (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins

Which venue prices "Counter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs 1WIN (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins" best? Direct comparison of Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair and Smarkets.

Map 1 Winner 100% Map 2 Winner 100% Match Winner 100% Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs 1WIN (+1.5) 100% Volume: $229K Liquidity: $255K Closes: 9 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Counter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs 1WIN (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Map 1 Winner100%
Map 2 Winner100%
Match Winner100%
Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs 1WIN (+1.5)100%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.590%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs 1WIN (+3.5)90%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.590%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.590%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.590%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs 1WIN (+6.5)90%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.590%
Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.550%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.550%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 33.550%
Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs 1WIN (+3.5)26%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs 1WIN (+3.5)10%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs 1WIN (+6.5)10%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 1WIN (-3.5) vs 100 Thieves (+3.5)10%
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-9.5) vs 1WIN (+9.5)10%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 1WIN (-3.5) vs 100 Thieves (+3.5)10%
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-9.5) vs 1WIN (+9.5)10%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.510%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.51%
O/U 2.5 Games0%

Market context

100 Thieves are scheduled to face 1WIN in a best-of-three at the Esports World Cup open qualifier play-ins, and the listed settlement is tied to the named match rather than a broader tournament run. The market is already priced at 100% YES on Polymarket, which is a useful reminder that its quote is an implied probability, whereas platforms such as Betfair and Smarkets usually present decimal or fractional odds that incorporate commission, so a “certain” market can still differ materially in payout after fees and liquidity costs.

The historical frame is that 100 Thieves have already been used as a live reference point in this qualifier, including a straight-sets win over NADE and an earlier bracket match against INFINITE, both of which point to the team being active and progressing through the open event rather than sitting on a stale listing.[8][12] Separately, 1WIN have shown upset capacity in the same qualifier ecosystem, with recent reporting on their elimination of Team Liquid in a BO3 playoff match, which matters because open qualifiers can produce abrupt roster volatility even when the market leans heavily one way.[7] For comparison-shopping across venues, Polymarket’s binary format will resolve directly on the match outcome, while Betfair and Smarkets would typically express the same view through price moves and exchange liquidity, not a yes/no share price.

The main catalysts now are confirmation that the BO3 actually starts and finishes inside the settlement window, plus any last-minute schedule changes from the organiser or broadcast desk. Match schedulers currently place the game on the August 9 slate, but qualifier events can be reshuffled around earlier rounds, technical delays, or bracket dependencies, and that matters because this market can settle 50-50 if the match is not played or is left undecided beyond the window.[5][9] For traders comparing books, KYC access also matters: Polymarket’s crypto-native structure and exchange-style peers generally differ from regulated sportsbook-style access on Kalshi, while Betfair and Smarkets are typically subject to regional onboarding and tighter account verification, so the same match can be tradable at very different times and in very different legal wrappers.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares Counter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs 1WIN (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Play-Ins specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
What about Smarkets as an alternative?
Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
Are all these platforms regulated?
No. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated (US). Betfair and Smarkets are UK Gambling Commission licensed. Polymarket operates without explicit regulation — a different risk profile than a regulated sportsbook.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs 1WIN (BO3) - Esports … on Kalshi Alternative

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →